Choosing between XM, Exness, and ICMarkets in 2025 can be a real challenge, especially when each broker claims top tier service. With so many overlapping features, tight spreads, fast execution, strong regulation traders must dig deeper to find the best fit. Whether you prioritize raw pricing, platform flexibility, or funding convenience, understanding how these brokers stack up in real-world performance is essential to making the right decision this year.
In this detailed comparison, we’ll evaluate XM, Exness, and ICMarkets across multiple key factors: trading conditions, fees and spreads, regulation and safety, trading platforms, and suitability for different types of traders.
What are XM, Exness, and ICMarkets?

XM, Exness, and ICMarkets are three of the most well-known retail forex and CFD brokers globally. Each has its own regulatory framework, business model, and asset offerings. Understanding their differences is essential for traders choosing the right platform based on jurisdiction, product scope, and trading style.
Who owns and regulates each broker?
-
XM is a brand of Trading Point Holdings Ltd, with its primary entities regulated by:
-
CySEC (Cyprus) – for EU operations
-
ASIC (Australia) – for Australian clients
-
DFSA (Dubai) – for MENA region
-
FSC (Belize) – for global retail clients
-
-
Exness is operated by Exness Group, regulated by:
-
FCA (UK) – for institutional services
-
CySEC (Cyprus) – for EU coverage
-
FSA (Seychelles) and FSCA (South Africa) – for international clients
-
-
ICMarkets is owned by International Capital Markets Pty Ltd, regulated by:
-
ASIC (Australia) – core entity
-
CySEC (Cyprus) – for Europe
-
FSA (Seychelles) – for global retail markets
-
All three brokers are licensed by multiple top-tier and offshore authorities, which allows them to operate globally while maintaining flexibility in regulatory requirements.
Where are these brokers headquartered and who are their target markets?
-
XM is headquartered in Cyprus, with regional offices in Australia and Dubai. It primarily targets:
-
Retail traders in Europe, Southeast Asia, MENA, and Latin America
-
Offers multilingual support and localized deposit options in over 190 countries
-
-
Exness is based in Limassol, Cyprus, with strong operations in Southeast Asia and Africa. Its target markets include:
-
Forex traders seeking flexible leverage and raw spreads
-
High-volume traders and algorithmic systems
-
-
ICMarkets is headquartered in Sydney, Australia, and focuses heavily on:
-
Scalpers, algorithmic traders, and institutions
-
Markets in Asia-Pacific, Europe, and Africa
-
Each broker caters to both beginner and advanced traders, but ICMarkets leans more toward technical and professional users, while XM offers more educational support for beginners.
What asset classes are offered (Forex, Crypto, Indices, etc.)?
Here’s a quick breakdown of the trading instruments available at each broker:
Broker
|
Forex
|
Crypto
|
Indices
|
Commodities
|
Stocks
|
ETFs
|
Bonds
|
XM
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
❌
|
❌
|
Exness
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
❌
|
❌
|
ICMarkets
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
✔️
|
-
All three brokers offer Forex and major CFDs, but ICMarkets stands out with broader exposure to ETFs and bonds.
-
Exness is known for its ultra-flexible leverage and crypto pairs, while XM is strong in educational tools and regional accessibility.
Which broker offers the best trading conditions?

Trading conditions like spreads, commission fees, leverage, and swap-free options directly impact profitability. Here’s a detailed look at how XM, Exness, and ICMarkets compare in 2025 based on the latest available metrics and client experience. For those evaluating XM specifically, an updated XM Broker Review helps clarify where it stands in terms of trading costs, execution quality, and account flexibility.
Who has the lowest spreads for major forex pairs in 2025?
-
ICMarkets consistently delivers the lowest average spreads, especially on EUR/USD (as low as 0.1 pips) under its Raw Spread account with a commission of $3.5 per side.
-
Exness also offers tight spreads, typically starting from 0.1–0.3 pips on Raw accounts. However, spreads may widen during volatility or inactivity.
-
XM provides spreads from 0.6 pips on the Ultra Low account, with no commissions, which can be attractive for casual or low-volume traders.
Verdict: ICMarkets leads to raw spreads for active traders; XM is better for commission-free trading with competitive fixed spreads.
Which broker offers the most favorable commission structure?
-
XM has a commission free structure across all account types. Its Ultra Low account combines decent spreads with zero commissions, ideal for those preferring simplicity.
-
Exness charges commissions on Raw accounts, typically $3.5 per side per lot, but offers unlimited leverage, which offsets some trading costs for experienced users.
-
ICMarkets uses a similar commission model ($7 round-trip per lot) but provides access to ECN pricing and tighter spreads, especially for scalpers.
Verdict: For low-frequency traders, XM’s zero commission model is most favorable. For high-frequency or institutional-style trading, ICMarkets offers better value per trade.
How does leverage and margin level compare between the three?
-
Exness offers unlimited leverage (in certain jurisdictions), which is unmatched but comes with dynamic margin rules and risk controls.
-
XM provides leverage up to 1:1000 (outside of EU/AU regulated regions), with margin calls at 50% and stop-out at 20%.
-
ICMarkets offers leverage up to 1:500, which is lower than Exness but remains standard for ECN brokers. Margin call is at 50%, stop-out at 20%.
Verdict: Exness wins in leverage flexibility. XM offers high leverage too, but with stricter compliance. ICMarkets favors stability over maximum leverage.
Which broker has the best swap-free (Islamic) account policies?
-
XM offers Islamic accounts on all account types upon request. It does not charge swap fees but may apply a fixed fee after a holding period, depending on the instrument.
-
Exness also provides swap-free options, but traders must qualify based on region and religion, and synthetic fees may apply.
-
ICMarkets offers Islamic accounts under its Raw and Standard setups, but swap free conditions are limited to certain instruments, and holding periods may trigger alternative charges.
Verdict: XM provides the most transparent and flexible Islamic account policy overall, especially for traders seeking zero interest across major account types without heavy limitations.
How Do XM, Exness, and ICMarkets Perform in Execution Speed and Slippage?

Order execution speed and slippage are critical for traders, especially during news events or when using automated trading strategies. Below is a direct comparison of XM, Exness, and ICMarkets in 2025 across key execution attributes.
Which broker executes orders fastest and most reliably during news events?
-
ICMarkets leads in execution speed with average times under 40 milliseconds, thanks to Equinix NY4 server infrastructure and low-latency ECN routing.
-
Exness also performs well, with execution speeds between 50–70ms, supported by a stable STP model and adaptive liquidity.
-
XM, while reliable for retail trading, averages 100–150ms execution speeds and may show slight delays during major macroeconomic releases.
Verdict: ICMarkets offers the fastest and most consistent execution during news events. Exness is a strong second; XM is stable but slower under volatility.
How frequently does slippage occur during volatile market conditions?
-
Exness handles news volatility well, with advanced order-matching and real-time liquidity adjustments, resulting in lower slippage.
-
ICMarkets, while generally precise, may see brief slippage spikes during high-impact events due to order volume.
-
XM shows moderate slippage on standard accounts during peak volatility but manages it reasonably with limit/stop protections.
Verdict: Exness offers the best slippage control during news. ICMarkets perform well with occasional variance. XM is adequate for non-scalping strategies.
Do these brokers support VPS for high-speed scalping or Expert Advisors (EAs)?
-
ICMarkets provides free VPS to high-volume traders, connected to Equinix NY4, with latency below 1ms, ideal for scalping and automated trading.
-
Exness includes integrated VPS access, with good performance for EA hosting, especially for MT4/MT5 users.
-
XM also supports VPS through third-party providers; traders with sufficient volume can get it free, though latency is slightly higher.
Verdict: ICMarkets offers the best VPS infrastructure for latency-sensitive strategies. Exness provides reliable in-platform VPS. XM supports VPS with conditions.
Which Broker is Better for Beginners vs Experienced Traders?
Choosing the right broker depends heavily on a trader’s skill level. This comparison breaks down how XM, Exness, and ICMarkets serve the needs of beginners versus experienced traders, focusing on education, platform features, and trading support.
Which broker is most accessible for new traders?
-
XM is one of the most beginner-friendly platforms, offering a low $5 minimum deposit, commission free accounts, and a highly structured education center with webinars, articles, and trading basics.
-
Exness also provides a smooth onboarding process, though its educational content is lighter and more self-guided.
-
ICMarkets targets more advanced users, with less hand holding during account setup and fewer beginner-specific resources.
Verdict: XM is the most accessible broker for beginners, thanks to rich learning materials and low entry barriers.
What do professional traders gain from each broker?
-
ICMarkets is tailored for professionals needing tight spreads, ultra-fast execution (<40ms), ECN pricing, and compatibility with cTrader, MT4, and MT5. It also supports VPS and API access for advanced automation.
-
Exness appeals to high-volume or algorithmic traders by offering unlimited leverage, low-latency execution, and real-time account analytics.
-
XM provides moderate customization through MT4/MT5 and VPS support, but is less specialized for institutional grade trading.
Verdict: ICMarkets is ideal for institutional-style or algorithmic traders; Exness benefits those using high-leverage or multi-account strategies; XM suits semi-experienced traders wanting balance.
Do these brokers offer quality demo accounts and structured learning tools?
-
XM shines in this area with an unlimited demo account, segmented learning paths, and live trading webinars led by analysts.
-
Exness offers a demo account with full market functionality but fewer structured learning paths.
-
ICMarkets provides a functional demo for MT4/MT5/cTrader but lacks dedicated beginner training or mentorship.
Verdict: XM provides the most education-driven environment, making it ideal for learners. Exness and ICMarkets offer solid demos but less formal guidance.
What Types of Accounts and Deposit Options Are Available?

When choosing a broker, traders in Vietnam often compare the variety of account types, deposit requirements, local payment support, and specialized account features. Here’s how XM, Exness, and ICMarkets compare across these criteria.
How many account types are available, and what are the minimum deposits?
-
XM offers 3 main account types: Micro, Standard, and Ultra Low, each with a $5 minimum deposit, suitable for beginners and small-scale traders.
-
Exness provides 4 main account types: Standard, Standard Cent, Raw Spread, and Zero—with $10 minimum for Standard and $200+ for Raw/Zero accounts.
-
ICMarkets has 2 core accounts: Standard and Raw Spread, both requiring a $200 minimum deposit, targeting experienced or professional traders.
Verdict: XM offers the lowest barrier to entry with just $5, ideal for new traders. Exness offers flexible options. ICMarkets is geared toward higher-capital users.
Which broker supports fast, low-fee deposits and withdrawals in Vietnam?
-
Exness excels in local support, offering instant deposits/withdrawals through Internet Banking, QR Pay, and ViettelPay, often with zero transaction fees.
-
XM also supports Internet Banking and e-wallets in Vietnam, with fast processing and no hidden fees, plus the XM Deposit Bonus for extra trading value.
What Types of Accounts and Deposit Options Are Available?
When choosing a broker, traders in Vietnam often compare the variety of account types, deposit requirements, local payment support, and specialized account features. Here’s how XM, Exness, and ICMarkets compare across these criteria.
How many account types are available, and what are the minimum deposits?
-
XM offers 3 main account types: Micro, Standard, and Ultra Low, each with a $5 minimum deposit, suitable for beginners and small-scale traders.
-
Exness provides 4 main account types: Standard, Standard Cent, Raw Spread, and Zero—with $10 minimum for Standard and $200+ for Raw/Zero accounts.
-
ICMarkets has 2 core accounts: Standard and Raw Spread, both requiring a $200 minimum deposit, targeting experienced or professional traders.
Verdict: XM offers the lowest barrier to entry with just $5, ideal for new traders. Exness offers flexible options. ICMarkets is geared toward higher-capital users.
Which broker supports fast, low-fee deposits and withdrawals in Vietnam?
-
Exness excels in local support, offering instant deposits/withdrawals through Internet Banking, QR Pay, and ViettelPay, often with zero transaction fees.
-
XM also supports local payment methods, including Internet Banking and Ngân Lượng, but may involve slight delays or third-party processing times.
-
ICMarkets does not support direct local bank transfers in Vietnam, relying instead on international cards, e-wallets (Skrill, Neteller), and wire transfers often with longer wait times and fees.
Verdict: Exness offers the best local payment experience in Vietnam fast, free, and directly integrated. XM is acceptable; ICMarkets lacks local infrastructure.
Are Islamic or scalping-optimized accounts available?
-
XM supports Islamic (swap-free) accounts on all major account types, with transparent policies and minimal limitations ideal for faith-based traders. Scalping is also allowed across platforms.
-
Exness also offers Islamic accounts, but eligibility depends on regional and account type, with synthetic fees replacing swaps in some cases. Scalping is permitted with high leverage.
-
ICMarkets provides Islamic accounts on request, primarily on Raw and Standard accounts, and is highly favored by scalpers due to its low spreads, fast execution, and cTrader support.
Verdict: XM is the most flexible for Islamic accounts; ICMarkets is the best for scalping setups; Exness provides both options with some conditions.
Broker Battle 2025: Which Platform Wins in Each Category?

In 2025, XM, Exness, and ICMarkets remain top contenders in the retail trading industry. Each broker brings distinct advantages, depending on what traders prioritize cost efficiency, platform tools, or high-frequency trading performance. Here’s a category-by-category breakdown of who wins where.
Who Wins on Fees and Trading Costs?
-
XM stands out with its zero commission accounts and low $5 minimum deposit, making it ideal for cost-conscious or low-volume traders. Spreads start from 0.6 pips on the Ultra Low account.
-
Exness offers tight spreads (from 0.1 pips) on Raw accounts, but charges $7 per lot round-trip and has variable swap policies.
-
ICMarkets features the tightest raw spreads (EUR/USD ~0.1 pips), with $7 round-trip commissions, providing excellent value for volume traders.
XM – Best for fee simplicity and beginner friendly cost structure.
Best for Platform and Tools: Who Offers Superior Trading Infrastructure?
-
ICMarkets leads with MT4, MT5, and cTrader support, low-latency execution, and VPS hosting with Equinix servers, making it ideal for traders needing speed and precision.
-
Exness provides a proprietary web terminal, MT4/MT5 access, and real-time account analytics, offering a modern interface and risk tools.
-
XM supports MT4 and MT5, along with a comprehensive education center and market research, but lacks advanced third-party integrations.
ICMarkets – Best for platform variety, infrastructure, and professional tools.
Best for Scalpers and Day Traders: Who Handles Speed Best?
-
ICMarkets is optimized for scalping and high-frequency strategies, with <40ms execution speed, deep liquidity, and low raw spreads, making it the top choice for active traders.
-
Exness also allows scalping with unlimited leverage and STP execution, though spreads can vary during volatility.
-
XM permits scalping and offers solid execution, but slightly slower speeds (~100–150ms) and fixed spreads may limit ultra fast strategies.
ICMarkets – Best for scalpers, day traders, and EA users needing lightning-fast performance.
XM, Exness, and ICMarkets all stand out as reputable brokers in 2025, each trusted by traders worldwide. Still, there’s no single best choice—only the one that aligns with your personal trading goals and priorities. Consider what matters most to you, whether it’s pricing, speed, or support, and take the time to test each broker to see which one fits your strategy best. To better understand XM’s values and service philosophy, the About Us XM section offers insight into the broker’s mission, regulation, and global presence.

Lina Vexley is a forex education specialist with a passion for guiding new traders. She offers step-by-step lessons on MetaTrader and risk control, making XM accessible and practical for traders of all experience levels. Email: [email protected]